Contact Us

Case study

Healthcare data warehouse case study: migrating SQL Server reporting to Snowflake

ResultA SQL Server reporting warehouse was migrated to Snowflake through parallel running, reconciliation and report-owner sign-off.

Client
A US regional health system (anonymised)
Industry
Healthcare (hospitals and clinics)
Service
Data migration and data warehouse consulting: the dependency map, dual running, reconciliation, cutover report by report, and handover
Type
An on-premises SQL Server warehouse moved to Snowflake
Status
Delivered

We migrated a regional health system's reporting warehouse from its own data centre to Snowflake. The project covered source dependencies, transformations, access controls and the reports used by finance, quality and operations. Both platforms ran alongside each other while reports were reconciled and moved individually.

Cloud warehouse
SQL Server reporting migrated to Snowflake
Reconciled cutover
reports checked against the existing platform
Owner sign-off
report and access checks before migration

The starting point

The health system needed to move from a data centre that was scheduled to close. Its SQL Server warehouse depended on older ETL jobs and supported operational reporting as well as figures shared with outside organisations. Some transformation rules were not yet documented, and access grants had accumulated over time, so the migration needed more care than a direct table copy.

What we delivered

We mapped dependencies from query and job logs, rebuilt transformations with tests and mapped patient-level access before moving reports. Source feeds use change data capture where available and incremental extracts elsewhere. Daily comparisons record differences between the platforms and support investigation back to the underlying rule.

Rollout and handover

We built the new warehouse alongside the existing one and moved reports in stages. Each report required reconciled totals, permission checks and owner sign-off. Monitoring, alert routing and runbooks were handed to the health system's data team. Rollback remained available during cutover, and unused tables were handled through an owned archive process.

Where people remain in control

Report owners approve reconciled outputs and access checks before cutover. The data team owns ongoing operation and alert handling. A failed reconciliation holds the affected report while its cause is investigated.

Project outcome

The health system received a cloud reporting platform with tested transformations and documented operating procedures. Report-by-report reconciliation preserved the basis for comparing outputs during the move. Definition changes were kept separate from migration work so a difference in reported figures could be investigated rather than accepted as part of a redesign.

How performance is evaluated

Operational measures and comparison methods
MeasureHow it is measuredComparison point
Reports movedReports reading the new warehouse with their owner's signature, over every report on the dependency mapThe dependency map
Differences foundEach difference between the two warehouses, with the rule behind it once namedFrom the first day both run
Tables archivedTables archived with a named owner's sign-off, over all tables on the old warehouseThe assessment
Query speedp95 on each report's workload, replayed on both warehousesThe old warehouse, replayed
Age of the dataHow old the newest row is when each report reads it, starting with the daily dashboardsThe old warehouse's nightly load
Platform billCredits used each month, with the months both warehouses run shown on their own lineThe envelope in the plan

Technologies and tools

  • SQL Server in the health system's data centre, until the quiet period ends
  • Snowflake, in an account the health system owns
  • Change data capture where a source supports it, incremental extracts elsewhere
  • dbt, with each old job rewritten as a tested transformation
  • Airflow, scheduling the loads and the daily comparison that logs every difference
  • The health system's BI tool, its reports repointed one at a time
  • Monitoring and alert routing, with the runbooks in the health system's repository

Bring us the warehouse you're preparing to move

Tell us which platform you're moving from, your target date and roughly how many reports rely on it. An engineer replies within two business days with what the assessment would map before any data moves.